|
CITY OF SAN
JOSÉ, CALIFORNIA Department of
Planning, Building and Code Enforcement 801 North First
Street, Room 400 San José,
California 95110-1795 |
Hearing
Date/Agenda Number P.C.
11/28/01 Item |
|||
|
|
File Number PDC 01-02-029 |
|||
|
STAFF REPORT |
Application Type Planned Development Rezoning |
|||
|
|
Council District 6 |
|||
|
|
Planning Area Central |
|||
|
|
Assessor's
Parcel Number(s) 261-10-086 |
|||
|
PROJECT
DESCRIPTION |
Completed by: Britta
Buys |
|||
|
Location:
Northeast corner of West Taylor and Elm Streets |
||||
|
Gross Acreage: 0.40 |
Net Acreage: 0.40 |
Net Density: 7.5
DU/AC |
||
|
Existing Zoning: R-2
Residence |
Existing Use: Vacant
daycare |
|||
|
Proposed Zoning: A(PD)
Planned Development |
Proposed Use: 3
single-family detached residences |
|||
|
GENERAL PLAN |
Completed
by: BB |
|||
|
Land Use/Transportation
Diagram Designation Medium Density Residential (8-16 DU/AC) |
Project
Conformance: [x ] Yes [
] No [x ] See
Analysis and Recommendations |
|||
|
SURROUNDING LAND
USES AND ZONING |
Completed
by: BB |
|||
|
North: Multi-family attached and single-family
detached |
R-2
Residence |
|||
|
East: Single-family
detached |
R-2
Residence |
|||
|
South: Single-family detached |
R-2
Residence |
|||
|
West: Single-family detached and
multi-family attached |
R-2
Residence |
|||
|
ENVIRONMENTAL
STATUS |
Completed
by: BB |
|||
|
[ ] Environmental Impact Report found
complete [ x] Negative
Declaration adopted on November 8, 2001 |
[ ] Exempt [ ] Environmental Review Incomplete |
|||
|
FILE HISTORY |
Completed
by: BB |
|||
|
Annexation
Title: College Park/Burbank Sunol |
Date:
12/08/25 |
|||
|
PLANNING
DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS AND ACTION |
||||
|
[ x ] Approval [ ] Approval with Conditions [ ] Denial |
Date: _________________________ |
Approved
by: ____________________________ [ ] Action [ x ]
Recommendation |
||
|
APPLICANT /
OWNER / DEVELOPER |
||||
|
The E&H 3rd FLP Attn: Emily Chen 21009 Seven Springs Parkway Cupertino, CA 95014 |
||||
|
PUBLIC AGENCY
COMMENTS RECEIVED
Completed by: BB |
|
|
Department
of Public Works See attached
memorandum. |
|
|
Other Departments and Agencies See attached Fire Department memorandum. |
|
|
GENERAL
CORRESPONDENCE |
|
|
Letter from The Board of the College Park Neighborhood Association, dated August 10, 2001, attached. |
|
|
ANALYSIS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS |
|
The
applicant, Emily Chen, is requesting a Planned Development Rezoning from R-2
Residence to A (PD) Planned Development to allow 3 single-family detached
residences on 0.40 gross acres. The
subject site is roughly rectangular in shape, with approximately 180 linear
feet of frontage on West Taylor Street.
The site is currently developed with a single-family detached residence
that was most recently used as a child daycare facility.
The
site is mostly surrounded by single-family detached residences. A duplex is located immediately adjacent to
the project to the north, and several other multi-family attached residences
are located in the surrounding neighborhood.
The
proposed project contains two single-family detached residences that will share
a common driveway from West Taylor Street, and one single-family detached
residence that is accessed from Elm Street.
The existing single-family residence will be rehabilitated; the two new
residences are designed to be architecturally compatible with the existing
house.
Notices
of the public hearing and the Draft Negative Declaration were distributed to
the owners and tenants of all properties located within 500 feet of the subject
site. The applicant presented the
proposal to the College Park Neighborhood Association, which has indicated
support for the project. (See attached
letter) Staff has been available to
discuss the project with interested members of the public.
An Initial Study was prepared for this
project and the Director of Planning adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration
on November 8, 2001. The key issue
addressed in the Negative Declaration was the project’s impact on historic
resources. The existing building is
listed on the Historic Resources Inventory as a Contributing Structure. The applicant initially proposed to demolish
the house, but revised the project to preserve the building. The existing residence will be
rehabilitated, and the two proposed residences have been designed to be
compatible in mass, scale and style.
Staff will work with the applicant at the Planned Development Permit
stage of the project to ensure that the integrity of the existing residence is
maintained.
No ordinance-size trees are proposed for removal on the project site. The developer proposes to remove some trees to allow for the development, however, a number of mature trees will be preserved. New trees will be planted as part of the development. A noise analysis prepared for the proposal identifies mitigation that has been incorporated into the project. The Negative Declaration concludes that the project will not result in a significant impact on the environment.
The subject site is designated Medium Density
Residential (8-16 DU/AC) on the San Jose 2020 General Plan Land
Use/Transportation diagram. The
proposed project has been found to be in conformance with the General Plan
based on the Discretionary Alternate Use Policy, Two-Acre Rule, which allows
parcels under two acres in size to be developed at the next lower residential
density range (8 DU/AC) if the proposed use is compatible with the surrounding
neighborhood and conforms to the Residential
Design Guidelines. This project
furthers all of the objectives of the Two-Acre Rule. Less than two acres in size, the proposed infill project is
located within an urbanized area where infrastructure and services exist, and
the use of the Rule to allow a reduced density (7.5 DU/AC) at this location
will facilitate a project compatible with the surrounding existing neighborhood. As discussed below, the project is
compatible with adjacent and neighboring residential land uses and is in
substantial conformance with the City’s Residential
Design Guidelines.
The primary issues discussed are (1) consistency with the Residential Design Guidelines, and (2) compatibility with surrounding uses.
The project proposes subdivision of the existing parcel into three lots. The existing single-family residence, approximately 2,577 square feet in size, will be located on a 7,654 square-foot corner lot. Lots 2 and 3 will each be 3,870 square feet in size. The proposed houses on Lots 2 and 3 will be 2,913 square feet in size, and have been designed to conform to the standards established in the Residential Design Guidelines (RDG) for single-family detached projects on 3,000 to 4,000 square-foot lots.
The proposed front setbacks for Lots 2 and 3 are 24 feet to the attached garage and 17 feet to the living area, both of which exceed the required setbacks. Rear setbacks are proposed at 20 and 18 feet to the first and second-floor living areas respectively; again exceeding required setbacks. Interior side setbacks are 4 feet, meeting the RDG standard. Side setbacks to the adjacent single-family homes are 7 feet, exceeding the 5-foot minimum requirement. Lots 2 and 3 will share a driveway to minimize curb cuts along West Taylor and to maximize both front yard landscaping and parkstrips within the public right-of-way. Covered parking will be provided for the new residences in form of tandem garages, which will minimize the amount of building façade devoted to the garages in conformance with the RDG. A new detached two-car garage will be provided for the existing residence.
Both new residences will have rear yards that are 20 feet deep (15-foot minimum required), and exceed the RDG minimum area of 500 square feet (675 square feet proposed). Both residences will also have landscaped front yards. The existing residence will have private open space of approximately 2,175 square feet.
The
existing one-and-a-half story single-family residence is identified as a
Craftsman Bungalow with Neo-Classical influences. The 1908 building features tri-level lap siding, a moderately
pitched roof, front bay window, and a columned front entry porch with a single
door. The proposed architecture for the
new residences incorporates many of the bungalow and neo-classical elements of
the existing residence including wood siding, moderately pitched roofs, front
bay windows, and the columned front entry with a single door. The two-story residences will also feature
windows with divided lights, and decorative braces under the gables. The proposed conceptual elevations are well
articulated and detailed in conformance with the requirements of the Guidelines, and are compatible with the
architecture found in the neighborhood.
Architectural details will be finalized at the Planned Development
Permit stage.
The neighborhood generally consists of one and two-story residences. Lot sizes in the immediate neighborhood vary from approximately 3,196 to 10,600 square feet. The parcels along the northerly side of West Taylor between Elm and Laurel Streets range between 3,196 to 4,560 square feet. The subdivision of the subject parcel will create one larger lot for the existing residence, and two smaller lots that are well within the range of lot sizes immediately adjacent to the project site. The architecture in the neighborhood varies, and includes Bungalow and Mission-style homes. The existing and proposed architecture of the project is consistent with the styles found in the neighborhood. The lot sizes and the proposed residences will not be out of character with the neighborhood. Based on this analysis, staff concludes that the project is compatible with adjacent uses.
Based on the above analysis, staff concludes that the
project is in substantial conformance with the Residential Design Guidelines and compatible with existing land
uses.
Planning
staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation to the
City Council to approve the subject rezoning for the following reasons:
1.
The
project conforms to the General Plan Land Use/Transportation Diagram
designation of Medium Density Residential (8-16 DU/AC) based on the
Discretionary Alternate Use Policy, Two-Acre Rule.
2.
The
project furthers the goals and objectives of the City’s in-fill housing
strategy.
3.
The
project is consistent with existing uses on adjacent sites.
4. The project is consistent with the Residential Design Guidelines.