City of San José, Capital of Silicon Valley  
  City Home City Services About San José Visitors Feedback
 
department title

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

  District 4 Home
background image
   
  About Kansen
  Kansen's Calendar
  Kansen's Blog
  Committees
  Events Calendar
  News Room
  Gallery
  District 4 Team
  District 4 Map
  Oct/Nov Newsletter NEW!
  Join Councilmember Chu's Email List NEW!
  Issue Tracking NEW!
  Youth Advisory Council
   
  Need Assistance
  City of San Jose Call Center
  Disabilities Access
 
 
  Reference Resources
  Neighborhood Troubleshooter
  Emergency Resoponse
  Government Link
 
 

Port Alviso? Ferry service from San Jose to San Francisco could happen

 

March 6, 2009
By David Goll

SAN JOSE — Decades after it faded as San Jose’s connection to the bay, a new port may once again put Alviso on the region’s beaten track.

Local business and government officials hope to hear this spring whether a $360,000 study into building a new port in the quiet bayfront community that seems a relic of the region’s past will go forward.

Pat Dando, president and CEO of the San Jose/Silicon Valley Chamber of Commerce, said a proposal was submitted this week to the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Economic Development Administration.

The federal agency has committed $180,000 toward such a study, an amount that must be matched by the chamber, city of San Jose, Santa Clara County and possibly other organizations for the application to be approved. A new port could create as many as 780 jobs and $285 million in annual economic benefits to Alviso, according to Rick Callender, governmental relations manager of the Santa Clara Valley Water District, who shepherded the proposal through its early stages.

“In this day and age, with this tight economy, a partnership between government and the business community that could have a major economic impact makes a lot of sense,” Dando said. “It leverages everyone’s limited funds. A project like this could create great economic stimulus and recreate the wonderful waterfront the city used to have 50 years ago. We could have restaurants and other businesses that could grow up to serve a port.”

Dando said she hopes to hear from the Department of Commerce in the next 30 to 60 days, but added that may be overly optimistic. The Chamber handled the application because it could process the paperwork more quickly as a nongovernmental agency.

Starting in the mid-1800s and continuing for about a century, the formerly independent town annexed by San Jose in 1968 received all manner of waterborne transport — from barges to passenger ferries — at a port that fell victim to decline and neglect. The formerly 100-foot-wide Alviso Slough has grown narrow and shallow from encroaching silt and vegetation. The slough is now just 20 feet wide.

No one involved in the project envisions a Silicon Valley version of the Port of Oakland 50 miles to the north, the nation’s fourth-busiest container port. Instead, a new port at Alviso would focus more on transportation than commerce, providing a ferry port for commute and emergency-preparedness purposes.

Jim Wunderman, president and CEO of the Bay Area Council, a San Francisco-based public policy advocacy group representing the region’s largest employers, has been a major proponent of the region upgrading its fleet of ferries. He said there will be fewer commuters on the roads and a fleet could be pressed into action in the event of an emergency, such as a major earthquake. And in the event an airplane crashed or landed in the bay, a new port would provide access for emergency workers.

“Alviso would be instrumental in bringing support, supplies and personnel to the South Bay in the event of a major quake that could damage bridges and roadways in the area,” Wunderman said, noting that the only port in the bay’s southern reaches is Redwood City. “If the (surface) transportation network of the region failed, water would provide the most reliable transportation option.”

He’s hopeful the port proposal won’t get bogged down in bureaucratic wrangling or not-in-my-backyard sentiments.

“It requires some ingenuity and boldness, which we sometimes lack here,” Wunderman said.

Callender said a new port could handle “light shipping” and goods transport along with the ferry traffic. He and Dando said any development would be balanced with protection of the area’s wetlands.

“The environment will be protected,” she said. “Cleaning out the mass root that has developed in the waterway will allow nature to make a comeback in the Alviso Slough.”

Echoing those sentiments was Kansen Chu, who represents Alviso and other North San Jose districts on the City Council. He said the water district’s Alviso Slough Restoration Project is reintroducing salt water to parts of the slough where freshwater vegetation has taken over. Balancing environmental restoration with economic growth resulting from a port could re-energize Alviso, Chu said.

In recent years Alviso has constructed a new library, community center and schools.

“There could be so many economic benefits to the immediate area and the region from a new port,” Chu said. “I’m hoping we will be able to restore some of the historical buildings, bring in new businesses and create a really vibrant community.”




 

Council District 4

 
 
 

Council District 4
200 East Santa Clara Street, San José, CA 95113
tel. (408) 535-4904 fax (408) 292-6459
district4@sanjoseca.gov

 

City Home - City Services - About San José - Visitors - Feedback - Search

As a customer-driven organization, the City of San José welcomes any suggestions you might have to help us serve you better.

Access Instructions for Users with Disabilities
Problems Viewing Site | Site Index


| E-Government Policies (PDF) | Statement of Purpose | Privacy and Disclosure | Security | Disclaimer | Contact Us |